Peter Green, reviewing Paul Cartledge’s new Alexander biography in TNR , cites a “remarkable anecdote told by Theophrastus, who surely had it from Aristotle when the latter was Alexander’s tutor”: “Both Philip and Olympias, he alleges, were scared that their adolescent son was showing signs of becoming a GYMNIS, that is, a ‘femme’ invert, and actually imported a high-class courtesan to straighten out his sexual drive.” Green comments, “If the anecdote is true, it would cast a very interesting light on Alexander’s subsequent career ?Emuch of which might be seen as the result of a compensatory denial on a truly colossal scale ?Eand it would suggest a highly cogent reason why Hephestion so long remained Alexander’s ‘other self’ and trusted confidant.” He summarizes Cartledge’s profile of Alexander as follows: “a military genius driven by an overwhelming obsession, a pothos, to pursue glory through conquest to the world’s end, and take savage reprisals against any who thwarted his will while he was had it.” In short, the Greek hero-adolescent mentality write VERY large.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.