Umberto Eco, ed. History of Beauty . Translated by Alastair McEwen. New York: Rizzoli, 2004. 438pp.
Bursting with splashy reproductions of art work from the ancient Greeks to the present, Eco’s History of Beauty could pass for a survey of Western art. Eco’s purpose, however, is broader; he intends a history of beauty and conceptions of beauty. In earlier eras, the association of beauty with fine art was not so instinctive as it is with us. Instead, “Beauty was a quality that could be possessed by natural things . . . while the task of art was solely to do the things it did well . . . to such an extent that art was a term applied even-handedly to the work of painters, sculptors, boat builders, carpenters, and barbers alike.” Hundreds of quotations about beauty and art from philosophers, theologians, artists, and critics fill the margins. Along the way, Eco and his collaborators discuss classical notions of proportion, light and color, ugliness and beauty, the sublime, and the functional beauty of modern machinery. Eco, who has published work on Thomas Aquinas’s aesthetics, gives due attention to the religious impulse behind the pursuit of beauty, and devotes several chapters to a sensitive treatment of the medieval mystical-aesthetic notion that “color is the cause of beauty.” History of Beauty is not only fascinating intellectual history, but a delight to the eyes and desirable to make one wise.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Philosophy
Continue reading related articles

Substance or Tune?
Jonathan Edwards didn’t think the world is a machine. At the heart of the mechanistic interpretation of Newtonian physics, he discerned, was the notion that “bodies” are (in Robert Jenson’s words) “the sort of thing that either can or cannot act ‘properly by themselves.’” The mechanistic world picture involved an…

Paul's Idol Polemics
Joshua Jipp argues that Paul's Areopagus address contains both critique and propaganda, critique of Athenian superstition, lust for novelty, and idolatry, and propaganda in favor of Christian faith as a more consistent fulfillment of the aspirations of Hellenistic philosophical theology. Much of the critique, Jipp shows, is drawn from Isaiah's…

Of Causes and Effects
This essay was first published in The Theopolitan, a weekly newsletter for Theopolis Partners. To become a Partner, you must donate at least $500 per year or $50 per month. Give here . Craig Carter’s Thesis #2 about Trinitarian classical theism ( Contemplating God with the Great Tradition ) is,…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.