O K, I can’t stop writing down remarks from Hart, so here’s another:
Nicolas of Cusa remarks that eternal wisdom is tasted in everything savored, eternal pleasure felt in all things pleasurable, eternal beauty beheld in all that is beautiful, and eternal desire experienced in everything desired ( Idiota de sapientia 1); he even claims that a man who sees a beautiful woman, and is agitated by the sight of her, gives glory thus to God and admires God’s infinite beauty ( Excitationes 7).
The last example seems a particular apt illustration of Hart’s claim that the category of “ethics” (in distinction from aesthetics and logics) is a postlapsarian intrusion in a world that originally was a seamless manifestation God’s glory and beauty, which are identical (by the doctrine of simplicity) to God’s righteousness and holiness and truth. Adam looking at Eve was “agitated by the sight of her,” yet without sin. The moral distinction between trembling before God’s beauty in a beautiful woman and lusting after a beautiful woman arises only in a fallen world. Indeed, in an unfallen world, one could not fail to be “agitated by the sight of her”; such a failure would be a fall, because it would reflect an unwilling to grant glory to God and give thanks.
As Hart points out in a section I quoted in the previous post, this raises the question of the unity of the transcendentals. They are separable into true, good, and beautiful only in a fallen world. Redemption would seem to demand the reunification of these, and the demolition of thought, life, and institutions into categories of logic, ethics, and aesthetics. Perhaps advocating “the good, the true, and the beautiful” perpetuates the fractured world of Adam. In Christ, we should perhaps speak only of the glory of God, which is His righteousness and His faithfulness. Any institutional or disciplinary separation of arts, philosophy, and ethics/politics seems to aid and abet the continuation of a world that is passing away rather than anticipating the world that is to come.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Theology
Continue reading related articles

In Praise of Thomas
Gotta love ol’ Tommaso d’Aquino, a.k.a. Thomas Aquinas. The margins of my various copies of his works are full of notes of disagreement and question marks, but still: His toss-off arguments are usually deeper than the sustained arguments of lesser theologians. Here’s a pot pourri from the early part of…

Hoping For Love
In his 2007 encyclical on hope, Spe Salvi , Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI observes that the experience of loving and being loved is a moment of “redemption.” Love gives new meaning, new joy, new energy. Every love is a new birth. We long and hope for love. We want it…

Is All That's In God God?
Divine simplicity is often summarized in the axiom, "All that's in God is God." If this is taken at face value, though, it conflicts with Trinitarian orthodoxy. 1) By this axiom, the Persons are identical with the essence of God. 2) But the Persons have (or are) identifying particularities or…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.