Peter Hanns Reill, ed., and Ellen Judy Wilson, principal author, Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment (revised edition; New York: Facts on File, 2004), 670pp.
Contemporary critics of modernity, including Christian ones, often focus their attacks on ?The Enlightenment,?Ethe intellectual and cultural movement that endured through the ?long eighteenth century?Ebetween Louis XIV and Napoleon. Castigated by its critics for its rationalism and rigorous logic-chopping, ?The Enlightenment?Eis seen as the source for many of the evils of contemporary social, intellectual, and political life. The authors of this volume offer a more nuanced picture of the movement. It is a mistake, for example, to believe that there is only one Enlightenment; Descartes?Egeometric rationalism, for example, came under severe criticism, and for many Enlightened thinkers ?feeling and sensation replaced reason as the grounds upon which all human understanding and activity were founded.?EFar from being committed to abstract reason and speculation, ?one basic strain?Erecurs in nearly every Enlightenment writer, ?namely a great disdain for abstract answers based on empty logic.?EThe Enlightenment was not so much an age of rationalism as an age of criticism, more an age of autonomy than an age of system-building. As Kant defined it, ?Enlightenment is man?s release from his self-incurred tutelage. Tutelage is man?s inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another.?EThe Encyclopedia is clearly written, well-indexed, thoroughly cross-referenced, and gives a surprising amount of attention to theological writers and subjects (articles, for example, on Anglicanism, Calvinism, Lutheranism, Jansenism, the Jesuits, Reimarus, Vico, Hamann, and Reimarus). It provides an excellent overview of the current state of research on this highly important turning point in Western history.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.