David Lachterman ( Ethics of Geometry ) suggests that the specific novelty of the modern age is that it doesn't regard itself as a period of history. It's instead "consummate," in two senses: "as the 'final' period which brings to a permanent close all prior epochs by exposing their imperfections and as the one period without a temporal finale. Its immanent end or telos is endlessness. Hence, the image of growth from historical infancy to historical adulthood, often figuring in early modern rhetoric, had to be abandoned as soon as those using it recalled that adulthood is naturally followed by senescence and death" (2). Modernity claims to have entered the eschaton. It's a consummation focused on a singular idea, the idea of "construction" or "the 'idea' of the mind as essentially the power of making, fashioning, crafting, producing, in short, the mind as first and last poietic and only secondarily or subsidiarily practical and theoretical. . . . For the radical moderns and their heirs, making - understood as (trans)formative or 'creative' technique - is neither an occasional nor an indispensable 'feat' performed by rational souls, the latter when it serves the indisputable needs of the body, the former when it puts artfully on display distinctively human activities; instead, making is definitive of the mind's 'nature' or better of its comportment in and toward the 'world.' We could parody Aristotle's account of nous by saying of the modern mind, 'Its actuality is making'" (4).
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Modernity
Continue reading related articles

God of Plagues
L.M. Sacasas ponders why the coronavirus spooks us. He says it's the pandemic's uncertainty and unpredictability, which destroys our illusions of control. We categorize it as an "accident" because we don't have other categories to wrestle with the unknown. It's a peculiarly modern mental tic. " To call something an…
Unrevolutionary Revolution
In the opening essay to Reflexive Modernization , Ulrich Beck defines the phrase in the book's title as "the possibility of a creative (self-)destruction for an entire epoch." This creative destruction is not the product of a crisis but the result of the "victory of Western modernization" (2). Quoting Marx…
Myth of Modernity
T he closer we look at “modernity,” argue Jean and John Comaroff in Modernity and Its Malcontents , the more “rapidly [it] melts into air” (xii, riffing on Marx). This is partly because there are always, and have always been, “many modernities” (xi). Modernity “becomes especially vague when dislodged from…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.