Science and faith seem to be at odds. Many have suggested that’s because believers look to faith to do thing faith can’t do; if we adjusted our expectations about what kind of truth religion gives, science would be freed from the annoyances of the faithful,
Tom McLeish ( Faith and Wisdom in Science ) suggests an rapprochement that works from the other direction. Taking the old notion of science as “natural philosophy” as a starting point, he suggests that the deep roots of scientific investigation are in our human awe at the natural world, and our desire to grasp its cunning wisdom. Science shouldn’t be the preserve of the “nerdy expert” or the media celebrity. It’s about “loving wisdom about nature” - philo-sophia . Wisdom seeks not only to understand the structures and processes of the creation, but to discover how to respond to a world of wonders.
Taking this approach, McLeish departs from the norm by beginning with Scripture texts other than Genesis 1-2. He starts with Proverbs 8’s depiction of Wisdom “playing” with creation. He expounds on the intricacy of creation by noting how order seems to bubble up from an underlying chaos. He argues that the Bible’s greatest reflection on science and the natural world is found in the book of Job, with its terrors and monsters.
Throughout, he emphasizes that “science emerges from an ancient longing, and from an older narrative of our complex relationship with the natural world” than our standard science textbooks give us. It’s science whose “primary creative grammar is the question, rather than the answer.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Science
Continue reading related articles

Corruption of Science
The world’s most interesting man, Matthew B. Crawford, offers a brilliant and chilling diagnosis of “How Science Has Been Corrupted” at UnHerd . The hinge of his analysis is the “dissonance between our idealised image of science, on the one hand, and the work ‘science’ is called to do in…

Evolution 2.0
Perry Marshall’s Evolution 2.0 is a devastating critique of Evolution 1.0, the neo-Darwinian theory Marshall summarizes in the equation, “Random mutation + natural selection + time = Evolution.” His critique focuses primarily on the “random mutation” factor. Scientists have experimented on fruit flies for decades. By causing mutations through radiation,…

Clapping Trees
Do trees clap their hands at the coming of the Lord? (Isaiah 55:2). Do they really ? We instinctively think not, and quickly classify such passages as literary personifications or anthropomorphic metaphors. Perhaps, writes Mark Harris in an essay in Knowing Creation , we’re too hasty. What’s the alternative? One,…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.