“The Federal Reserve is not your friend,” writes Judy Shelton in The Weekly Standard . Its policies encourage “unjustified risks in pursuit of monetary gain,” give incentives for “speculative conniving instead of virtuous endeavor,” offers reasons to borrow beyond our means to repay. Friends don’t do that to friends.
The heart of the problem is the freedom that the Fed has to create money, which foments “a destabilizing fissure between the real economy and the precarious world of high finance.” Because money creation is “out of sync with productive economic growth, the link between honest effort and reward is damaged.”
Fed policy is skewed to favor certain kinds of economic activity: there is “an increasingly divisive tension between high-profit activities conducted at trading desks for big money-center banks and next-to-nothing returns offered to average savings account holders. The Fed’s aggressive liquidity injections are showing up as asset bubbles in sophisticated global financial markets even as domestic consumer price indices show only modest increases; this two-tier effect favors ‘whales’ who can wager millions on exotic credit instruments while stiffing modest savers with negative real returns.”
Shelton worries not only about the distortion of economic incentives, but about the social consequences. We might say, she worries about the consequences of Fed policies on the American soul. Patience, prudence and restraint don’t get rewarded. Can America remain productive without those virtues? Can America be virtuous if our economy undermines virtue?
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Economics
Continue reading related articles

Politics of Price
What determines prices? Supply and demand, says anyone with a modicum of training in economics. Right, says Barry C. Lynn ( Cornered ): "In any open market that is populated by many small buyers and many small sellers, if the producers try to raise their prices high enough to make…

Scarcity
Once, argues Nicholas Xenos ( Scarcity and Modernity ), “scarcity” did not exist. What existed with “scarcities,” or “periods of scarcity.” He writes, “Of medieval origin, ‘scarcity’ derives from the Old Northern French escarcete . Its original usage denoted an insufficiency of supply, and by the fifteenth century the word…

Between Garden and City
Andrew Kuiper offers a superb, exhilarating summary of Sergei Bulgakov’s Philosophy of Economy . Kuiper begins by summarizing Bulgakov’s case against “economism,” the assumption shared by free marketeers and Marxists that human beings are motivated above all by economic drives. For both, man is homo economicus . Bulgakov had read…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.