Unlike many theorists who discuss the gift, Jacques Godbout ( The World of the Gift , 193) does not believe that is should “drown” everything, especially markets: “That would not only be impossible but also very harmful, for a great society (statistically speaking) needs the state and market apparatus. The system of the gift, if it were to replace them, would give rise to instances of personal domination that would be particularly grace, the perverse effects of a populism with which are are all familiar. A large society, by definition, inevitably implies a great number of bonds between strangers and partners known to one another. The state and the market are the proper systems for dealing with this kind of relationship, so that objects and services may circulate between strangers.” (For a chilling account of an effort to drown a modernizing nation in a system of reciprocity, see Jeffrey Brooks’s Thank You, Comrade Stalin!: Soviet Public Culture from Revolution to Cold War ).
Godbout adds (208): “The market enables us to pursue exchange under conditions where the gift is neither possible nor desirably, and where the alternative is violence or the complete absence of a relationship.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Economics
Continue reading related articles

Politics of Price
What determines prices? Supply and demand, says anyone with a modicum of training in economics. Right, says Barry C. Lynn ( Cornered ): "In any open market that is populated by many small buyers and many small sellers, if the producers try to raise their prices high enough to make…

Scarcity
Once, argues Nicholas Xenos ( Scarcity and Modernity ), “scarcity” did not exist. What existed with “scarcities,” or “periods of scarcity.” He writes, “Of medieval origin, ‘scarcity’ derives from the Old Northern French escarcete . Its original usage denoted an insufficiency of supply, and by the fifteenth century the word…

Between Garden and City
Andrew Kuiper offers a superb, exhilarating summary of Sergei Bulgakov’s Philosophy of Economy . Kuiper begins by summarizing Bulgakov’s case against “economism,” the assumption shared by free marketeers and Marxists that human beings are motivated above all by economic drives. For both, man is homo economicus . Bulgakov had read…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.