In a 2006 book on the origins of gnosticism, Carl B. Smith offers an alternative account of the connections of Judaism and gnosticism. According to the JETS reviewer:
Smith “proposes that gnosticism arose in a social context of ‘alienated Judaism’ influenced by Greco-Roman and early Christian ideas in the aftermath of the Jewish revolt against Emperor Trajan in AD 115-17. It is this historical location that is most distinctive about Smith’s proposal; the other elements, individually and together, have appeared in other scholars’ reconstructions of the origins of gnosticism. Issues related to ‘alienated Judaism’ have frequently been discussed over the years (e.g. R. M. Grant, A. Segal, B. A. Pearson, D. M. Scholer). Whether gnosticism had its origins before the rise of the Christian movement or after/within the Christian movement is a long-term debate. With Smith, a student of Yamauchi, the apple has fallen near the tree . . . . Smith’s ‘devaluation’ of the traditions about Simon Magus, which are probably too severe, are virtually necessary to his case that gnosticism did not originate before AD 115-17.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.