Things must be used in accord with their nature, argues Karol Wojtyla in Love and Responsibility . Human persons are rational and volitional, and thus “using” them as mere means to an end “does violence to the very essence of the other” (27).
But then what of employers trying to get employees to achieve the goals of the company, or commanders “using” soldiers to achieve strategic ends? This is only licit, Wojtyla argues, on the basis of love.
“I may want another person to desire the same good which I myself desire” and so I reveal my goals to him and persuade him that it is a good. “If this happens, a special bond is established between me and this other person: the bond of a common good and of a common aim.” Such a bond has an inner dimension, which “constitutes the essential core round which any love must grow” (28).
Thus, “if the employer and the employee so arrange their association that the common good which both serve becomes clearly visible, then the danger of treating a person as something less than he really is will be reduced almost to nothing. For love will gradually eliminate the purely utilitarian or consumer attitude to the person of the employee.” Commanders avoid treating soldiers as means to ends when “both are united by an attitude based on something like love . . . deriving from the joint pursuit of a common good” - the defense of the fatherland, for instance (29).
And relationship of persons, and any organization of persons, must have this same structure. Love is the essential foundation for a society that acknowledges the personhood of persons.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Philosophy
Continue reading related articles

Substance or Tune?
Jonathan Edwards didn’t think the world is a machine. At the heart of the mechanistic interpretation of Newtonian physics, he discerned, was the notion that “bodies” are (in Robert Jenson’s words) “the sort of thing that either can or cannot act ‘properly by themselves.’” The mechanistic world picture involved an…

Paul's Idol Polemics
Joshua Jipp argues that Paul's Areopagus address contains both critique and propaganda, critique of Athenian superstition, lust for novelty, and idolatry, and propaganda in favor of Christian faith as a more consistent fulfillment of the aspirations of Hellenistic philosophical theology. Much of the critique, Jipp shows, is drawn from Isaiah's…

Of Causes and Effects
This essay was first published in The Theopolitan, a weekly newsletter for Theopolis Partners. To become a Partner, you must donate at least $500 per year or $50 per month. Give here . Craig Carter’s Thesis #2 about Trinitarian classical theism ( Contemplating God with the Great Tradition ) is,…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.