Machiavelli offered a practical politics that emphasized image over reality: “it is not necessary for a prince to have all of the above-mentioned qualities, but it is very necessary for him to appear to have them. Furthermore, I will be so bold as to assert this: that practicing them, that all times is harmful; and appearing to have them is useful; for instance, to seem merciful, faithful, humane, forthright, religious, and [perhaps even] to be so; but his mind should be disposed in such a way that should it become necessary not to be so, he will be able and know how to change to the contrary.”
This reduction of politics reduced to a theater of power (the prince operating politically as Castiglione’s courtier did socially) fit neatly with Machiavelli’s own skeptical epistemology. As Giuseppe Mazzotta puts it, “Because one cannot trust appearances or public postures and discourses . . . one can only trust oneself.” Thus, Machiavelli’s skepticism limits “the knowledge of the external world” but also is “the triumph of private forms of knowledge over and above public discourse.”
With no certainty in appearance, one is forced inward to establish the foundations of knowledge. Machiavelli thus fosters Descartes’ retreat into “the inviolable interiority of oneself, into a philosophical garden, away from the turmoil and deceptions of history.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Philosophy
Continue reading related articles

Substance or Tune?
Jonathan Edwards didn’t think the world is a machine. At the heart of the mechanistic interpretation of Newtonian physics, he discerned, was the notion that “bodies” are (in Robert Jenson’s words) “the sort of thing that either can or cannot act ‘properly by themselves.’” The mechanistic world picture involved an…

Paul's Idol Polemics
Joshua Jipp argues that Paul's Areopagus address contains both critique and propaganda, critique of Athenian superstition, lust for novelty, and idolatry, and propaganda in favor of Christian faith as a more consistent fulfillment of the aspirations of Hellenistic philosophical theology. Much of the critique, Jipp shows, is drawn from Isaiah's…

Of Causes and Effects
This essay was first published in The Theopolitan, a weekly newsletter for Theopolis Partners. To become a Partner, you must donate at least $500 per year or $50 per month. Give here . Craig Carter’s Thesis #2 about Trinitarian classical theism ( Contemplating God with the Great Tradition ) is,…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.