Instead of continuing to quote de Zengotita until I’ve transcribed the whole book, let me summarize: This is the best anthropology of contemporary culture I’ve ever read. Somewhat reductive - I’m not sure that everything is so shaped by media as de Zengotita suggests. Mostly he makes a very compelling case for tying in our politics, relation to time and things, our habits of thought and feeling to the fact that (in one of his most succinct formulations) we live “in a world that is made up of a flattering field of represented options.”
He offers no “solutions.” In some ways, this is one of the strengths of the book. He suggests that the expectation of “solutions” is itself a media-induced expectation, one of the genre conventions of cultural commentary - a demand that leads to what he calls “bogosity.” Yet, not responding is impossible; not responding is a response, a decision to go with the flow. But if de Zengotita makes one thing clear, it’s that any real response or stance toward this world has to be a communal one, taking the form of a counter-culture.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Media
Continue reading related articles

Publicity
In the third of his 2001 Stob Lectures, published as Common Objects of Love , Oliver O'Donovan explores the modern phenomenon of "publicity," the distinctly modern proliferation of images and information through advertising, news media, and entertainment. Publicity didn't exist in the ancient world. Kings had messengers and spies, but…
Unforgetful
In Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age ,Victor Mayer-Schonberger explores the reversal of memory and forgetfulness in the digital age: “Since the beginning of time, for us humans, forgetting has been the norm and remembering the exception. Because of digital technology and global networks, however, this balance…
From Bauhaus to Your Mac
In an intriguing TNR review of Walter Isaacson’s Steve Jobs , Evgeny Morozov says that the Apple “philosophy” - a form of pop-Platonism emphasizing the link between “essence” and function, purity, unornamented sleekness - cannot be understood except as an expression of a modernist design aesthetic most famously embodied in…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.