Elias suggests that the blossoming of German literature in the late 18th century was largely led by middle-class writers and thinkers whose tastes and styles ran directly counter to the Francophile culture of Frederick’s court:
“This German literary movement, whose exponents included Klopstock, Herder, Lessing, the poets of Sturm und Drang , the poets of ‘sensibility,’ and the circle known as the Gottinger Hain , the young Goethe, the young Schiller” were among them. He continues, “In the writings of the young generation of the Gottinger Hain one finds expressions of wild hatred directed against princes, courts, aristocrats, ‘Frenchifiers,’ courtly immorality and intellectual frigidity. And everything among middle-class youth one finds vague dreams of a new united Germany, of a ‘natural’ life - ‘natural’ as opposed to the ‘unnatural’ life of court society - and again and again an overwhelming delight in their own exuberance of feeling.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.