Ramsay MacMullen describes the proper approach to a late Roman emperor: “Few saw him, for few were admitted to his presence. Properly searched first for weapons, one passed through rows of guards and rows of ponderous pillars to some more specially solemn portal, opening to a hall fifty, a hundred, or two hundred feet long. At the far end, an apse screened off by a curtain; everywhere, silence. The visitor was escorted to the screen, spoke through it, and received his reply; or, if more privileged, had the curtain parted for him and advanced to the throne, first to kneel, then, still kneeling, to preset a written petition held not in his contaminating hand but humbly covered in a fold of his garments. Certain ranks of officials were promoted through permissions to kiss the emperor’s robe, and might thereafter do so again whenever they were received in the palace.” Portrayals of the emperor had a message: “Here is your monarch, here is the gable above his head that sets off his divinity, here are his associates or sons, and to the sides stand his armored soldiers.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.