The November 21 TLS has a review of a biography of Nicolaus Steno (1638-86), a Danish physician, theologian, and convert to Roman Catholicism who was beatified in 1988. The reviewer gives this account of Steno’s contribution to medicine: “Between 1663 and 1665, he discovered the cheek salivary duct, identified female ‘testicles’ as ovaries, developed an accurate model of muscular contraction, settled the nature of the heart (summed up on his aphorism ‘the heart is a muscle’) and even made the first trule scientific description of the anatomy of the human brain.” In geology, he was the “first to demonstrate scientifically how, in a series of sedimentary layers, the upper layers are more recent than the lower . . . Steno’s second key discovery [in geology] was his proposal that the mysterious glossopetrae ?E’tongue stones’ ?Efound in many rocks, were in fact the teeth of dead sharks. By extension, other apparently organic objects found in rocks, such a seashells, were also the trace of living organisms.” He appealed to the waters of Genesis 1:2 and the flood to explain how aquatic life could be found on the top of mountains. His discoveries also raised questions about the possibility of extinction, which, according to the review, was considered impossible by most theology of the time.
The same review deals with a couple of recent books on James Hutton (1726-97), a Scottish farmer and physician who first argued for an old earth (Steno accepted biblical chronology).
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Science
Continue reading related articles

Corruption of Science
The world’s most interesting man, Matthew B. Crawford, offers a brilliant and chilling diagnosis of “How Science Has Been Corrupted” at UnHerd . The hinge of his analysis is the “dissonance between our idealised image of science, on the one hand, and the work ‘science’ is called to do in…

Evolution 2.0
Perry Marshall’s Evolution 2.0 is a devastating critique of Evolution 1.0, the neo-Darwinian theory Marshall summarizes in the equation, “Random mutation + natural selection + time = Evolution.” His critique focuses primarily on the “random mutation” factor. Scientists have experimented on fruit flies for decades. By causing mutations through radiation,…

Clapping Trees
Do trees clap their hands at the coming of the Lord? (Isaiah 55:2). Do they really ? We instinctively think not, and quickly classify such passages as literary personifications or anthropomorphic metaphors. Perhaps, writes Mark Harris in an essay in Knowing Creation , we’re too hasty. What’s the alternative? One,…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.