Is another man’s government administration. The abstract to a 1981 Annales article on clientage in the late Roman empire by Paul Veyne:
“In Fourth-century Rome, official posts were purchased from their holders. For officials, who were the equals of the curials and the ‘barons’ (as the ‘simple soldiers’ ought to be called), were landed rentiers, for whom administration was not a livelihood or a career but an additional dignity, or an occasional source of income or an insurance policy for the future.
“These notables absented themselves from their charge at will. Far from being the canker that gnawed away at the State from within clientelism was the State’s normal manner of operation. Corruption was far more than a simple abuse : the 4th-century administration was an original historical formation. The system was nothing short of a racket, exploiting the taxpayer and feeding off itself at every level. Like the kings of France, the Roman emperors, lacking a navy, used pirates and called them corsairs. This racket was not in competition with the State : it was the State, as in certain Central American countries today.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.