At various points in Discipline and Punish , Foucault notes how monastic discipline provided a model for early modern society forms. Factories were compared to monasteries not only in their organization but also in the spiritual dimension of factory management. Time-tables and rigorous time-keeping, as David Landes and others have pointed out, originated in monastic communities in order to keep track of liturgical hours. And this effort to “establish rhythms, impose particular occupations, regulate the cycle of repetition” (Foucault) was applied to schools, hospitals, workshops, and other modern institutions.
Here’s a question to investigate: Between the formation of disciplined monastic life and the modern institutions more or less modeled on theme, a Reformation intervened, which insisted on the priesthood of all believers and broke down the religion-secular distinction that existed among the medieval clergy. The question is: To what extent was the “secularization” of monastic disciplinary practices an effect of the Reformation? Or, to put it differently, can we integrate Foucault and Weber?
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.