A few quotations from Renaissance writers on the subject of ingratitude, drawn from Catherine Dunn’s excellent 1946 CUA dissertation on the subject:
Lodowick Bryskett argued that ingratitude was contrary to reason: “How shamefull a thing is it therefore to man, that brute beasts should give him examples of gratitude; and he contrariwise, on whom God hath bestowed so great a gift as reason to discerne the good from the bad, should rather follow the example of the worst sort of beasts in doing ill, then of such as by naturall instinct shew him the way to goodnesse?”
Simon Howard quoted from Cicero, who claimed that ingratitude was inhuman: “Nihil tam inhmanum, tam immane, tam ferum, quam committere ut beneficio non dicam indignus, sed victus esse videare.”
William Bullein makes a similar point in his 1579 Bulwarke of Defence against all Sicknesse: “There is also an other evyll, ioyned to condicions of wycked Men, whych is none of the passions of the Mynde, nor yet an infirmitye of Nature; but rather is an euyll moste intollerable and moste odious of all unto a good Nature, which is called Ingratitude, churlishness, or unkyndnesse.”
In As You Like It, Shakespeare compared the winter wind to human ingratitude: “Blow, blow, thou winter wind,/Thou art not so unkind/ As man’s ingratitude . . . . Freeze, freeze, thou bitter sky,/ That dost not bite so nigh/ As benefits forgot./ Though thou the waters warp,/ Thy sting is not so sharp/ As friend remember’d not.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.