Robert C. Solomon’s About Love (1988) is a wise and important book. I have some reservations about some themes: that love must be defined as the redefinition of the self in terms of another; his acceptance of a largely discredited opposition of eros and agape ; his non-Christian sexual morality; and a few other things. But the book is full of insight, and more useful than many Christian books on these topics. Here are, briefly, a few highlights:
1) Solomon’s definition of love includes the desire for response. That response doesn’t always come, but it is of the essence of love that it is reciprocal.
2) Solomon emphasizes that love an “emotional process” rather than a temporary feeling. This enables him to see romantic love in the intertwining of lives in two elderly people and to caution against confusing the excitement of infatuation with love.
3) He also is able to explain what makes the initial stages of love so exhilarating for many. The excitement and the challenge comes from the effort to coordinate two lives and to redefine the self in terms of the chosen lover.
4) Solomon argues that sexuality is the central difference between romantic and other sorts of love. Putting sex at the center of romantic love means that love is always embodied (or seeks to be). He is careful about how he describes sexual attraction and sexual experience. He refuses to reduce sexual pleasure to orgasm; it includes a whole range of forms of communication. And he refuses to define sexual attraction purely in terms of physical beauty, insightfully pointing out that what counts as beauty today is often a presentation of unvailability (the “who cares?” attitude of contemporary models), which is directly contrary to love’s trajectory.
5) Solomon rehabilitates fantasy and imagination in romance and sexuality. He castigates writers who can use “fantasy” only with reference to perverse adulterous fantasy. Imagination is at the heart of romance, he argues, because as we come to love, we are imagining a future life and a future self, formed by our love for another.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Philosophy
Continue reading related articles

Substance or Tune?
Jonathan Edwards didn’t think the world is a machine. At the heart of the mechanistic interpretation of Newtonian physics, he discerned, was the notion that “bodies” are (in Robert Jenson’s words) “the sort of thing that either can or cannot act ‘properly by themselves.’” The mechanistic world picture involved an…

Paul's Idol Polemics
Joshua Jipp argues that Paul's Areopagus address contains both critique and propaganda, critique of Athenian superstition, lust for novelty, and idolatry, and propaganda in favor of Christian faith as a more consistent fulfillment of the aspirations of Hellenistic philosophical theology. Much of the critique, Jipp shows, is drawn from Isaiah's…

Of Causes and Effects
This essay was first published in The Theopolitan, a weekly newsletter for Theopolis Partners. To become a Partner, you must donate at least $500 per year or $50 per month. Give here . Craig Carter’s Thesis #2 about Trinitarian classical theism ( Contemplating God with the Great Tradition ) is,…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.