Theopolis Logo
Sacrificium non maleficium

Sacrificium non maleficium

By Peter Leithart

How could Christ’s death be a sacrifice, since “those men who slew Christ did not perform any sacred act but rather wrought a great wrong”? ( ST , III, 48, 3). Christ’s passion is no sacrificium but a maleficium .

Thomas answers by stressing the voluntary character of Christ’s death. Augustine said that “Christ offered Himself up for us in the Passion,” and Thomas adds that “this voluntary enduring of the Passion was most acceptable to God, as coming from charity.” For the killers, Christ’s death was indeed maleficium . But the cross was not primarily an execution. Most fundamentally, it was Christ’s own act, done out of eternal love: “Hence it is Christ who is said to have offered this sacrifice, and not the executioners.”

Peter Leithart

Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.

In Medias Res

Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.

Donate

Theopolis is nearly 100% donor-supported. Consider joining us on our mission.

Give Now

In Medias Res

Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.

Donate

Theopolis is nearly 100% donor-supported. Consider joining us on our mission.