In an illuminating review in TLS (June 2), Felipe Fernandez-Armesto summarizes the evidence that the Spanish Civil War was, as it turns out, thoroughly Spanish. He debunks the myth that Spain never participated in European cultural movements, pointing out that “liberal” is derived from a Spanish word, that Spain was one of the first nations to adopt a “genuinely democratic franchise,” and played an important role in urbanization, industrialization, socialism and anarchism, and so on.
The Spanish Civil War, by contrast, is seen as a microcosm of European and even global conflicts, but this is a mythical retelling of the reality. It was instead a uniquely “Spanish tragedy”: “Foreigners who, at the time, saw it as their war, were deluded by propaganda - whether they were German or Italian ‘volunteers’ against Bolshevism, or Catholic ‘crusaders’ against atheism and secularism, or freedom-loving fighters against Fascism, or anti-Communist capitalists or anarchists, or anti-Stalinists Trotskyists or anti-Trotsky Stalinists.” The conflict was not a simple Left-Right battle: “Until the war stimulated recruitment, fortified identities, and demonized foes, there were virtually no Fascists and few Communists in Spain.”
Fernandez-Armesto summarizes hsi view of Franco’s conversion to Catholicism with “L’Espagne vaut bien une messe,” and he notes that the wider alliances did not follow ideological lines: “Stalin . . . sold weapons to both sides. Goering was implicated in clandestine and exploitative arms deals with Republicans. Neither Hitler nor Moussolini had much fellow-feeling for Franco, whom they supported partly to give their armies and aircraft an airing.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.