Yang Jisheng’s Tombstone: The Great Chinese Famine, 1958-1962 is intended as a monument to members of his family, and to the 30 million others, who died in Mao’s famine.
The famine left horrors in its wake: “Some villages transported corpses by the truckload for burial in common graves. In villages where survivors lacked the strength for proper interment, the limbs of the dead protruded from the ground. In some places, the dead remained along the roadsides where they had dropped in their futile search for food. More than a few were simply left in their homes, where rats gnawed at their noses and eyes” (13).
Not just rats: “Cannibalism was no longer exceptional . . . during the Great Famine, some families resorted to eating their own children . . . . Reliable evidence indicates that there were thousands of cases of cannibalism throughout China” (14).
It was unprecedented because it was not due to war, climate change, or epidemics. It was, Jisheng makes clear, Mao’s famine.
Mao erected a “secular theocracy that united the center power with the center of truth. Divergence from Mao’s views was heresy,” and the fear of heresy ensures that lying was woven into the government. By imposing communal kitchens on China’s villages, dismantling stoves, and taking control of all livestock and plants, the government all but ensured starvation.
Mao warned, for instance, that there might be too much food, and promised inexhaustible supplies. People gorged themselves, used up their surplus, and then waited for government replenishment that never came. Food was under the control of government officials, and as a result “the communal kitchens became bastions of privilege,” who not only fed themselves from the common supplies but brutally punished any villagers who violated the rules (20-21).
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.