Stanley Kurtz of the EPPC has a lengthy essay review of Philip Carl Salzman’s Culture and Conflict in the Middle East (Humanity Press) in the April 14 issue of The Weekly Standard . The book comes with the endorsement of Daniel Pipes, who calls it “one of the handful of most important books I’ve read during nearly four decades of studying the Middle East” - which is high praise indeed. Kurtz calls the book “a major event: the most penetrating, reliable, systematic, and theoretically sophisticated effort yet made to understand the Islamic challenge the United States is facing in cultural terms.”
I won’t even try to sum up Kurtz’s review; tolle lege , as they say. Only a few brief notes: Kurtz traces the conflicts in the middle east to the persistence of a stateless, semi-anarchic tribal system; he says that the West has overlooked this partly because “tribe” has become a cuss word in the academy (especially since Said’s politically-interested Orientalism ); he summarizes Salzman’s field work among the “nomads of Iranian Baluchistan,” and notes that tribal loyalties, values, and conflicts persist even in cities and towns; he elicits a cheer, perhaps even 1.25, for the modern nation state.
Kurtz’s piece should be read alongside Jody Bottum’s superb Girardian analysis of militant Islam in First Things a couple of years ago.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles
Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…
The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…
Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.