Some very interesting material in Richard Muller’s book on the Trinity, the fourth volume of his monumental Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics . First, a couple of quotations about the treatment of the Trinity in early Reformed Orthodoxy:
One of the major features of this period was “a broadened sense of the significance of the doctrine [of the Trinity] as a basis for understanding the divine operation in other doctrinal topics (notably predestination, the ordo salutis, and covenant)” (p. 83). Jerome Zanchi’s De tribus Elohim is particularly interesting in this regard: “The word is significant for its exegetical (as opposed to more speculative) emphasis and for the fact that Zanchi placed [the doctrine of the Trinity] first in order in the model for his massive (and, unfortunately, never fulfilled system), before his discussion of the essence and attributes in the De natura Dei ” (p. 85). Zanchi thus reversed the order that Rahner said was characteristic of post-Aquinas Western theology.
Muller also examines the debates regarding the Trinity that the Orthodox carried on with the Remonstrants. According to Arminius, only the Father possessed the quality of aseity, and the Son and Spirit were not, as Calvin had argued, autotheos . It would be intriguing to trace out this debate to see how it relates to the more famous debates between Reformed and Remonstrants.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Books
Continue reading related articles

Imperium Sine Fine?
Virgil calls Rome an imperium sine fine . Can he be serious? Every other city that appears in the epic — Troy, Carthage, Latium — is doomed. How can Rome escape? How has the world changed to make a permanent city possible? Perhaps I’m looking for too much philosophy from…

The Tragic Ancient World
The whole ancient world is tragic because the only way to bring happiness and peace is through imposition of power. Aeneas is the hero of pietas , which includes the meaning of pity; he conquers with tears in his eyes because he knows what his conquests cost. His motto is…
Aeschylus
After reading through a stack of papers on Aeschylus’s Oresteian trilogy, a few thoughts have occurred to me, mainly having to do with my unbegun and doubtless forever unfinished work on the atonement, sacrifice, and so on. Essentially, these thoughts all boil down to one question: What would Aeschylus have…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.