Arendt has some sharp observations on the dangers of bureaucratization in On Violence (81):
“Bureaucracy is the form of government in which everybody is deprived of political freedom, of the power to act; for the rule by Nobody is not no-rule, and here all are equally powerless we have a tyranny without a tyrant.” Writing in 1970, Arendt finds in this an explanation of the student protests that targeted the “system”: “In a fully developed bureaucracy there is nobody left with whom one can argue, to whom one can present grievances, on whom the pressures of power can be exerted.” It is “impossible to localize responsibility and to identify the enemy” (39). Since Nobody is responsible, the protests lashed out against the System.
She claims that “the transformation of government into administration, or of republics into bureaucracies, and the disastrous shrinkage of the public realm” is one of the key political realities of modernity. This can only have the effect of frustrating real political action, the ability to “act in concert, and to reach out for goals and enterprises” that are novel” (82). Even where “freedom of speech and association is still intact,” the ability to act is muzzled by bureaucracies, including those of the political parties.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Politics
Continue reading related articles

Political Gospel
The gospel isn't an apolitical message that happens to have political implications. It’s not a message of private salvation with downstream public consequences. Exactly the opposite. The gospel is public and political truth with personal consequences. All the vocabulary of the gospel is political. The Greek word for “gospel” –…

When Idolaters Move In
What should Christians do if we discover there are idolaters living down the street? Lots of tangles in the question. For better or worse, the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. We can debate whether or not the Framers intended the Constitution to protect Hindus and Muslims. In actual legal…

Free Speech
Free speech is a fundamental value of liberal politics, an expression of John Stuart Mill's promise that we can do and say anything , so long as we do no harm. It's a false promise. Absolute free speech was always a ruse. Speech has never been entirely free. It can't…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.