David Yeago writes “The modern secularity project was not a demonic upsurge of incomprehensible hostility to the faith; it was in large measure the attempt of decent minds to cope with the chaos public Christianity had wrought in the wake of the Reformation. The incapacity of Christians to live together in charity in the biblical world subverted the cultural plausibility of that world and motivated the urgency with which the secularist project strove to get the Bible under control. Indeed, precisely in order to liberate their faith from complicity in violence and murder, Christians of all ecclesiastical parties took part in the establishment of the secular culture, in which ‘religion’ would be private, and secular rationality firmly in charge of the public square. The historical-critical movement cannot be understood apart from its ideological roots in secularist thinkers, like Hobbes and Spinoza, but scholars in the churches (mostly, but not only, Protestants) took up both the critical challenge and much of the ideological motivation of these great skeptics in the interests of producing a ‘purified’ Christianity, that is, one that limited its claims to the proper sphere of ‘religion,’ the moral and spiritual life of the inner person.”
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.