Max Boot defines terrorism as “the use of violence by nonstate actors directed primarily against noncombatants . . . in order to intimidate or coerce them and change their government’s policies or composition” ( Invisible Armies: An Epic History of Guerrilla Warfare from Ancient Times to the Present ). So defined, terrorism has been comparatively rare before the 19th century. There were the “Nizari Ismailis, a Shiite sect of the eleventh century AD that was persecuted by the rest of the Mustlim world. To carve out space to practice and proselytize their religion, their first great leader, Hasan-i Sabbah, took to assassinating his foes” (206). He mentions the ancient Sicarii in passing, and the Catholic conspirator Guy Fawkes.
For terrorism to spread, Boot argues, four things are needed: “destructive and portable weaponry, the mass media, literacy, and secular ideologies.” “Literacy” is something of a surprise on that list, and Boot explains that in countries like Russia “Universities became petri dishes of extremist ideologies . . . both reactionary and radical.” Universities provided “a growing number of educated people from whom terrorists could draw recruits and whom they could try to influence” (209).
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from History
Continue reading related articles

Realness of Things Past
Greg Anderson began thinking about the thesis of his Realness of Things Past while working on a book on the “state” in classical Greece. He discovered there was no such thing as an Athenian “state,” and that conclusion led him to question the way historians do history. Instead of running…

The Power of the Margins
David Martin (1929-2019) was a secularization skeptic. He acknowledged that modern societies typically undergo a process of "differentiation," in which various sectors of social and political life free themselves from the oversight of religious authority. He acknowledged that in many modern societies religious institutions and values are "marginalized." But he…

Zwinglian Symbolism
Nathan Mitchell (writing in the Oxford History of Christian Worship , 324) denies that Zwingli taught a "mere symbolist" according to which the Supper "simply served to remind believers of the great benefits bestowed on them through Christ's passion and death." Zwingli wasn't a symbolist "in any modern sense." Mitchell…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.