In an interview in the March 17 issue of World , Duke’s theologien provocateur Stanley Hauerwas expresses sympathy for the view that killing to protect the innocent is allowable, but refuses to let his sympathy budge him from his pacifist convictions.
It is never right to kill “to prevent another from being killed.” If this puts him in uncomfortable position, it’s one he’s williing to accept: “Christian nonviolence is a harsh and dreadful love requiring at times we may have to watch the innocent suffer for our convictions.” Apparently, sympathy for actual victims doesn’t budge Hauerwas either.
Hauerwas wants to protect the innocent if he can, only he doesn’t want to do it violently. Overcome evil with good, Paul says, and the pacifist leaps to the conclusion that Christians are prohibited from mounting violent resistance in any circumstances.
That assumes, however, an indefensible equation of violence with evil. Violence comes in such varied shapes, sizes, and contexts that it cannot be classed as one thing. One might borrow a page from Hauerwas himself and say that violence is always part of a story, and good or bad depending on its place in the plot.
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Politics
Continue reading related articles
Political Gospel
The gospel isn't an apolitical message that happens to have political implications. It’s not a message of private salvation with downstream public consequences. Exactly the opposite. The gospel is public and political truth with personal consequences. All the vocabulary of the gospel is political. The Greek word for “gospel” –…
When Idolaters Move In
What should Christians do if we discover there are idolaters living down the street? Lots of tangles in the question. For better or worse, the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. We can debate whether or not the Framers intended the Constitution to protect Hindus and Muslims. In actual legal…
Free Speech
Free speech is a fundamental value of liberal politics, an expression of John Stuart Mill's promise that we can do and say anything , so long as we do no harm. It's a false promise. Absolute free speech was always a ruse. Speech has never been entirely free. It can't…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.