In one of the essays in Word and Church , John Webster acknowledges that there is a danger of “spiritualizing” the church when the “asymmetry of divine and human action” is emphasized.
He thinks the claim that Protestantism is pure subjectivism is a “caricature,” but the charge “identifies a potentially disruptive element in the dogmatics we have just outlined. Can a society which is in its essence ‘invisible’ ever be really human - that is, historical, material, bodily?” What must be stressed is that “the concept of the invisibility of the church is a standing denial of any easy identification of divine and human work” (197).
Necessary as this “gesture” is, it can’t be allowed to take over the whole of ecclesiology: “when this necessary gesture takes over, and is allowed to become the only constitutive moment for ecclesiology, other problems quickly emerge, and a picture of the church is promoted in which the human Christian community is unstable, liminal, and so incapable of sustaining a coherent historical and social trajectory” (197). It’s a limiting concept; a bow of humility.
What must also be stressed is the ordering power of the Spirit: “The ‘spirituality’ of the church and its ‘visibility’ or ‘order’ are not quite different entities, the latter, perhaps, clothing the former but bearing no essential or intrinsic relation to it. Order does not constitute the church apart from the vivifying and sanctifying grace of the Spirit; but the life and holiness which the Spirit bestows are ordered because human, social and continuous. The danger of collapsing Spirit into structure ought not to frighten us into the equal danger of a purely punctiliar or actualistic ecclesiology. Church order is the social shape of the converting power and activity of Christ present as Spirit” (197-8).
Peter Leithart
Peter J. Leithart is President of Theopolis Institute. He is the author of numerous books on theology, literature, and culture, including Theopolitan, Defending Constantine, and Baptized Body.
More from Ecclesiology
Continue reading related articles

Ecclesiocentrism
Ecclesiocentrism is both a theoretical framework and a practical agenda for a Christian politics after liberalism. THEORY 1. The gospel is an inherently political message, announcing the Lordship and Kingship of Jesus. 2. Christian political theory is ecclesiology. Or, more moderately, no political theory can be Christian without a central…

Do We Need the Church?
A few weeks ago, I gave an online talk for the Colson Center. These were my opening comments. Let me begin by playing a game theologians often play, the game of challenging the question. The title of this series is, “The Essential Church: Why Christians (and the World) Still Need…

Eschatological Polity
In an essay on “Eschatology” in the Blackwell Companion to Political Theology , the late Robert Jenson argues that Christian eschatology is “directly and almost exclusively a discourse about politics.” The coming of the kingdom means that “the eschaton-polity” Israel hoped for, “the universal polity of peace, appeared as a…
In Medias Res
Your weekly digest for all things Theopolis.